Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lopez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/16/07
03/14/07 HB
SHORT TITLE
Protection of Certain Patient Info
SB 674/aSJC
ANALYST Hanika Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Department of Health (DOH)
Higher Education Department (HED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
The Senate Judiciary Committee Amendment strikes language excluding specific portions of
meetings and records of public hospitals related to patient care made confidential due to federal
and state laws from the Open Meetings Act.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The SJC Amendment will exclude all portions of public hospital meetings and records related to
patient care made confidential due to federal and state laws from the Open Meetings Act.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 674 amends Section 10-15-1 NMSA of the Open Meetings Act to exclude portions of
meetings of committees or boards of public hospitals dealing with the confidential care or
treatment of patients including information such as analyses, plans, records or reports, pertaining
to professional credentialing activities, peer review, or quality improvement activities involving
the quality of care provided by the hospital and its providers.
The bill also amends Section 14-2-1 NMSA of the Inspection of Public Records Act to provide
pg_0002
Senate Bill 674/aSJC – Page
2
an exception from the right to inspect public hospital records related to the confidential care and
treatment of patients, including information such as analyses, plans, records or reports, pertaining
to professional credentialing or privileging activities, peer review, quality improvement activities
involving the quality of care provided by the hospital and its providers regardless of whether the
information provided is subject to the Open Meetings Act.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Agencies should be able to make any statutory changes resulting from the enactment of this bill
with existing staff and resources.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The amendment to the Open Meetings Act will impact the meeting of committees or boards of
public hospitals dealing with matters related to care and treatment of patients. The changes
recommended will make matters related to patient health, care, and treatment confidential as
applicable by state and federal laws.
The amendment to the Inspection of Public Records Act makes records in public hospitals
related to the care and treatment of patient confidential as applicable by state and federal laws.
DOH reports that the bill may encourage hospitals to explore their practices with less fear of
litigation.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The bill attempts to provide additional protection of privacy of public citizens in matters related
to the care and treatment of their health. However, the AGO is concerned the bill may be
construed to prevent the release of general patient safety data that is helpful to consumers in
determining hospital infection rates, mortality rates, and outcome measures for specific medical
procedures.
The Federal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act established procedures for the
voluntary, confidential reporting of medical errors to patient safety organizations (PSOs). A PSO
is an organization certified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) that seeks to
improve patient safety and quality through collecting and analyzing patient safety data. After
medical errors have been voluntarily and confidentially reported to the PSO, the PSO in turn
submits the data to a national database for analysis and recommendations on ways to improve
patient safety and reduce medical errors. The data reported to the PSOs will be shielded from use
in liability suits and other litigation. This information cannot be used against a provider by an
accrediting agency or other regulator. Organizations cannot punish employees based on good-
faith reporting of information. Again, the AGO is concerned the bill may be construed as
providing greater privilege and confidentiality protections which might prohibit the voluntary
disclosure of information in accordance with Federal law.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Open Meetings Act is known as the "sunshine law." All states have such laws, which are
essentially motivated by the belief that the democratic ideal is best served by a well-informed
public. Sunshine laws generally require that public business be conducted in full public view,
pg_0003
Senate Bill 674/aSJC – Page
3
that the actions of public bodies be taken openly, and that the deliberations of public bodies be
open to the public.
The Inspection of Public Records Act provides an open window for the public and media to
access information deemed of importance to the public interest. The law requires open access to
almost all public records in state and local government with few exceptions. Under the Act the
public citizen or group has the right to take legal action if they are denied access to public
records and awarded attorney fees if they are proven right.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The Open Meetings Act and the Inspection of Public Records Act will continue to include public
discussions and disclosure of patient health, care and treatment information as allowed by current
provisions in both statutes.
QUESTIONS
What other states have passed similar legislation.
AHO/nt