Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Sanchez, M.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2-10-07
3-09-07 HB
SHORT TITLE State Engineer Permits for Subdivisions
SB 693/aSFl
ANALYST Woods
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
N/A $190.0* $190.0* $380.0* Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
*OSE Projections
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the State Engineer (OSE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFl Amendment
The first amendment proposed by the Senate Floor reinstates previous language. The amendment
states that “before approving the final plat for a subdivision containing twenty or more parcels,
any one of which is two acres less in size, the board of county commissioners shall require that
the sub divider provide a copy of a permit obtained from the state engineer…"
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 693 seeks to amend Section 47-6-11.2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1995, Chapter 212,
Section 13) to read as follows:
pg_0002
Senate Bill 693/aSFl – Page
2
47-6-11.2. WATER PERMIT REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Before
approving the final plat for a subdivision containing five or more parcels, any one of which
is two acres or less in size, the board of county commissioners shall require that the sub
divider provide a copy of a permit obtained from the state engineer, issued pursuant to
Section 72-5-1, 72-5-23 or 72-5-24 NMSA 1978, or if the subdivision is located within a
declared underground water basin, provide a copy of a permit obtained from the state
engineer issued pursuant to those sections or to Section 72-12-3 or 72-12-7 NMSA 1978
for the subdivision water use. In acting on the permit application, the state engineer shall
determine whether the amount of water permitted is sufficient in quantity to fulfill the
maximum annual water requirements of the subdivision, including water for indoor and
outdoor domestic uses. The board of county commissioners shall not approve the final plat
unless the state engineer has so issued a permit for the subdivision water use.
There is no appropriation attached to this legislation.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
OSE anticipates this bill will add a workload of 2 FTEs at $90,000/FTE for a total of $180,000
per year; however, no in-depth cost analysis has been provided.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES:
OSE opines that if Subsection B of the subdivision act is stricken and subsection A, as amended,
will remain as the operative language. This section of the subdivision act provides that the Board
of County Commissioners shall require water right permits from the state engineer for all
subdivisions containing five or more parcels, any one of which is two acres or less in size, prior
to final plat approval.
OSE notes that the subdivision act was substantially amended in the mid-1990s, with those
changes taking effect July 1, 1997. One of the changes was to allow counties the option of
approving final plats without having a state engineer water right permit in place. The water right
permitting process can be a lengthy and controversial process. If a water right application is
either protested, or if the applicant believes they have been aggrieved by the state engineer’s
permit, it is referred to the state engineer’s administrative hearing process. Once the state
engineer has rendered an order from that process, it can be taken up in district court and be
appealed ultimately to the Supreme Court.
By requiring counties to have state engineer permits in place at the time of final plat, OSE
suggests that there may be a substantial delay in final plat if a water right permit application is
either aggrieved or protested. Moreover, that, if enacted, domestic wells are not a water supply
option for any subdivisions containing five or more parcels, any one of which is two acres or less
in size.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS:
OSE indicates that the principal performance implication will be if there are new applications to
the state engineer. It appears that there is a requirement that subdivisions containing five or
more parcels, any one of which is two acres or less in size will be required to have water rights
pg_0003
Senate Bill 693/aSFl – Page
3
permit. Additionally, the statute change will likely limit the number of subdivisions the can have
domestic wells. This will increase the number of water right applications that will need to be
processed by the office of the state engineer, thereby affecting this agency’s ability to meet its
water rights processing performance measures.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS:
OSE advises that the number of new water right applications is difficult to determine, and that
the effect of this statue will include an increased burden on the agency’s water right processing
functions, including hydrology, water use, conservation and subdivisions, water rights personnel,
administrative litigation and the hearing bureaus of the agency. The time to process applications
will increase and directly affect the timeliness the state engineer’s action on protested and
aggrieved permits, this resulting in the agency’s projected increase of 2 FTE.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES:
OSE further suggest that, if enacted, subdivision planning will have to provide for the filing of
water rights applications one or more years before the permits are needed for final plat approval.
BS/nt