Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Ryan
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/17/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Refund of Certain Public Regulation Fees
SB 868
ANALYST Earnest
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the Attorney General (AOG)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 868 enacts a new section of the Public Utility Act to allow the Public Regulation
Commission (PRC) to refund the $25.00 fee for filing a complaint if the PRC dismisses a
complaint for lack of probable cause and if PRC determines that the dismissed complaint was
filed in good faith.
The bill also would repeal Section 70-3-19B of the Pipeline Safety Act, which requires the
Attorney General to represent the PRC and the state in any action to enforce the provisions of the
Pipeline Safety Act or any regulation of the PRC.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
None identified.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The bill presumably refers to fees paid to file complaints with the Public Regulation Commission
pg_0002
Senate Bill 868 – Page
2
by municipalities, or by other affected persons, alleging that any rate, service regulation,
classification, practice or service in effect or proposed to be made effective is in any respect
unfair, unreasonable, unjust or inadequate, as authorized by NMSA Section 62-10-1. Fees are
established in NMSA Section 62-13-2.
PRC has the authority to hire personnel it deems necessary to carry out the provisions of the
Pipeline Safety Act and to retain attorneys to handle the legal matters of the commission, give
advice and counsel, and represent the commission in any legal proceeding. By repealing NMSA
70-13-19B, this bill will eliminate conflicting provisions regarding representation of the PRC.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to OAG, if this bill is enacted, the Attorney General will no longer by responsible by
statute for representing the Public Regulation Commission in matters brought pursuant to the
Pipeline Safety Act. However, eliminating the requirement that the Attorney General represent
“the state" in such matters will not affect the ability of that office to do so pursuant to NMSA
Section 8-5-2.
ALTERNATIVES
AOG offers the following alternative:
Rather than refunding a fee for the filing of a complaint that was dismissed, might it not be more
appropriate to refund the fee for the filing of a complaint that is granted.
BE/nt