Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Cravens
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/21/07
HB
SHORT TITLE DWI Offender Interlock Driving for 6 Months
SB 941
ANALYST Earnest
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to House Bill 774
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 941 amends Section 66-5-33.1 NMSA 1978 to require a minimum of six months of
alcohol-free driving with an ignition interlock device before reinstatement of a driver’s license.
“Six months of alcohol-free driving" is defined as driving a vehicle equipped with an ignition
interlock device on at least 150 days out of a 182-day period, during which time the ignition
interlock device does not record an alcohol concentration of more than .05 in the driver’s breath.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
None identified.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 941 – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
DFA is concerned about the stricter requirements in this bill. According to DFA: “Six months of
‘alcohol-free driving’ will be difficult for most individuals because they will need to comply
with stricter standards. If the driver exceeds the breath alcohol limit, the time period begins
again. There is a possibility that some offenders may never have six months of alcohol-free
driving, and therefore would never be driving without an ignition interlock. The restriction could
also increase the number of DWI offenders driving on a revoked or suspended license, which is
currently at 50%."
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
DFA also indicates that the Motor Vehicle Division (MVD) of the Taxation and Revenue
Department finds that the mandated six months of “alcohol-free driving" could increase their
administrative costs. They would need a system in place to verify with the ignition interlock
providers whether an offender was “alcohol-free" for six-months.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 941 relates to Senate Bill 774.
ALTERNATIVES
DFA provides the following alternatives:
Mandate that all DWI offenders must install an ignition interlock in a vehicle as part of
their probation.
Keep the six month requirement but remove the “alcohol-free driving" as one of the
requirements.
Shorten the time period to make it more reasonable for offenders to comply.
BE/mt