Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Martinez, R.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2-19-07
HB
SHORT TITLE Rio Arriba Youth Environmental Conservation
SB 1020
ANALYST Aubel
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$150.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to Relates to SB 294 and HB 419
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
See
narrative Recurring
GF
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB 1020
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the State Engineer (OSE)
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
Youth Conservation Corps (YCC)
Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 1020 appropriates $150.0 thousand from the general fund to the New Mexico
Environment Department for the purpose of supporting a youth environmental conservation
program in Rio Arriba County, including acequia restoration, cultural preservation and
conservation activities.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1020 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $150.0 thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general
fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY08 shall revert to the
general fund.
SB 1020 does not direct whether the appropriation would only support the activities of the youth
conservation program or whether the appropriation would cover any staffing costs. Assuming
the $150.0 thousand would only support the activities, NMED specifies additional funding would
be required to support staff to oversee this program within the Environment Department under
the Surface Water Bureau. Two additional Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) to oversee and direct
the program would cost approximately $100.0 thousand in additional administrative support.
One FTE administrative position would approximate $30.0 thousand.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) has identified
“alternative activities,’ notably including summer and after-school employment opportunities for
older youth, as a key strategy for preventing and dissociating gang involvement and for reducing
youth-involved property crime.
Currently, NMED has no youth environmental conservation program and nothing in place to
support such a program. The Environment Department’s Surface Water Bureau oversees
acequias in New Mexico. Watershed restoration is part of that bureau.
The New Mexico Youth Conservation Corps Act (Section 9-5B-2 NMSA 1978) was established
in 1992 to provide a process to employ youth in public projects that conserve New Mexico’s
natural resources and provide community benefits of lasting value. The New Mexico Youth
Conservation Corps was established under the New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural
Resources Department.
According to the New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department Youth
Conservation Corps Annual Report for 2006, $223,372 has been appropriated for projects in Rio
Arriba County.
DCA notes that a variety of information on acequias and cultural properties is kept by the
department’s Historic Preservation Division. Because preservation statutes might apply to
projects designed for public or private land, the need to consult these files through the Historic
Preservation Division should be incorporated into the proposed youth environmental
conservation program. A related activity, partially funded through the Historic Preservation
Division, was carried out by the Okay Owingah Housing Authority on Pueblo land in Rio Arriba
County using state-of-the art Global Information System (GIS) technology. This experience
could serve as a model for the project proposed in SB 1020.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
Because NMED does not currently have a youth program, implementing this appropriation
would require hiring additional staff to oversee the program and administrative support to assist
in hiring and overseeing the youth.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 1020 – Page
3
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
NMED expressed concerns that it could be perceived as discriminative by supporting only Rio
Arriba County. Projects and funding for other counties and areas of the state would not be
eligible for assistance through this appropriation. NMED also noted that the additional full time
staff would require knowledge of Child Labor Laws under the State of New Mexico.
DCA maintains that project planners will need to consult with DCA’s Historic Preservation
Division to determine whether planned activities on state or private land must comply with
existing statutes, including 18-6-1 through 17 NMSA 1978, 18-6A-1 through 6 NMSA 1978, and
18-8-1 through 8 NMSA 1978. Project planners would consult with the Historic Preservation
Division for planned activities on federal land under 36 CFR 800.
All agencies point out that SB 1020 does not indicate how the program would be sustained or
funded in the future.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Relates to the $2.5 million recommended in the Governor’s Executive Budget Recommendation
as part of the FY08 Office of Workforce Training and Development (OWTD) operating budget
for a year-round youth employment program. The recommended appropriation is one of the
Governor’s initiatives for OWTD during FY08.
Relates to House Labor and Human Resources Committee substitute for House Bill 419, which
appropriates $5.0 million from the general fund to OWTD for FY07 and FY08 to fund a
statewide summer youth employment pilot program.
Relates to SB 11117 and HB 111, which would appropriate funding in the same amount ($150
thousand) for what appears to be management or administrative functions to establish water
restoration strategies in the upper Chimayo watershed, a portion of Rio Arriba County.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
NMED points out that SB 1020 does not contain a history of restoration needs in Rio Arriba
County, a description of what conservation activities are proposed, nor does the term “support"
define administrative support or project support. Thus NMED concludes it is unclear how it
would utilize the appropriation to comply with its intent.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
EMNRD suggests that watershed conditions and acequias may continue aging, with resulting
deterioration and lost opportunities for water conservation. The opportunity for youth to
participate in the respiration efforts and cultural heritage would be lost.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
Would another state agency, such as OWTD, be better suited to carry out this important
program.
pg_0004
Senate Bill 1020 – Page
4
2.
As an alternative, could the $150.0 thousand appropriation be made to the YCC for a
grant to carry out the programs’ directives.
MA/mt