Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Berry
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/22/08
1/29/08 HB 197/aHTPWC
Highway Project Gross Receipts to Road Fund
SB
ANALYST Schardin
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
FY10
20,248.7
19,128.6 Recurring State Road Fund
(20,248.7)
(19,128.6) Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB235
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
No Response Received From
Department of Transportation (DOT)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HTPWC Amendment
The House Transportation and Public Works Committee amendment directs that the new
distribution to the state road fund created in the bill will be applicable to revenue earned on a
modified accrual basis after June 20, 2008. This provision eliminates the bill’s FY08 fiscal
impact.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 197 amends section 7-1-6.10 NMSA 1978 to create a new distribution from the
general fund to the state road fund. Each month, the distribution will equal 1/12 of the amount of
state gross receipts tax paid in the prior fiscal year by the Department of Transportation on
contracts for maintenance, design or construction of state highways. The bill provides that DOT
will certify the amount of gross receipts tax paid on such projects in the prior fiscal year by July
10 of each year.
pg_0002
House Bill 197/aHTPWC – Page
2
Further, the bill provides that revenues distributed to the road fund pursuant to this new
construction gross receipts tax provision must be used only for public highway maintenance,
construction and improvement.
The effective date of the provisions is July 1, 2008 (see Technical Issues).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD estimates that DOT contracts for maintenance, design or construction of state highways
will total $394.2 million in FY09 and $324.3 million in FY10. The road fund distribution from
this gross receipts tax provision is expected to be $20.2 million in FY09 and $19.1 million in
FY10.
This bill provides for continuing appropriations. The LFC has concerns with including
continuing appropriation language in the statutory provisions, as earmarking reduces the ability
of the legislature to establish spending priorities.
Because most state highway projects occur outside municipalities, the state will usually collect
five percent gross receipts tax on the affected contracts and distribute the same amount it
collected to the road fund. However, when state highway projects occur within municipalities,
the state will collect only 3.775 percent and still distribute 5 percent to the road fund because
municipalities receive 1.225 percent of the state rate. This effect on general fund revenue will be
small except when the state undertakes major highway projects within a municipality, such as the
Coors interchange or the “Big I" at the intersections of Interstates 40 and 25 in Albuquerque.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
This bill is recommended by the HM35 Infrastructure Task Force which met in the interim to
investigate transportation infrastructure priorities and revenue requirements. More information
about the task force recommendations can be found at the DOT website:
http://www.nmshtd.state.nm.us/upload/images/Final%20Report%20NM%20Transportation%20
Futures%20Task%20Force%20Report%20Nov%2015%202007.pdf
.
According to the Department of Transportation, slow-growing revenues and high project cost
inflation have challenged the department’s ability to serve the state’s growing transportation
needs. According to the Final Report of the House Memorial 35 Study, after adjusting for
inflation and population growth, New Mexico dedicates 23 percent less to transportation funding
than it did 20 years ago. The report also states that about 15 percent of state highways and 16
percent of state bridges are currently in poor condition.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
Transportation infrastructure enables a state’s economy to grow and allows safe transportation of
people and goods. DOT reports that the state’s economy will suffer if transportation
infrastructure continues to deteriorate.
pg_0003
House Bill 197/aHTPWC – Page
3
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Each fiscal year prior to July 10, DOT will be required to certify the amount of gross receipts tax
revenue paid in the prior fiscal year on certain contracts. The bill will impose no significant
administrative impact on TRD.
DUPLICATION
House Bill 197 duplicates Senate Bill 235.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The bill could also be amended so that only 3.775 percent of the 5 percent gross receipts tax
would be transferred to the state road fund for contracts in municipalities. This would insulate
the general fund from losing more revenue than is actually paid on construction contracts.
SS/bb