Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR King
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/21/08
2/14/08 HB
221/aHVEC/aSFl#1
/aCC
SHORT TITLE Allow Electronic Voting System Negotiations
SB
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY08
FY09
FY10 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$1,268.6 $1,268.6 $2,537.2 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB517
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Secretary of State (SOS)
Association of County Clerks (ACC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of CC#1 Amendment
Conference Committee Amendment 1 approves HVEC amendment that allows the State Board
of Finance to dispose of electronic voting systems acquired pursuant to the law. It disapproves
the Senate Floor amendment and enacts a new section that requires the state to pay all voting
systems software and hardware maintenance costs regardless if the system is state or county-
owned; it requires the counties to both store and pay storage costs for the voting systems
regardless if the system is state or county-owned. It also amends Section 1-9-12 NMSA 1978,
Care and Custody of Systems, to clarify that it is the county clerk’s responsibility to properly
pg_0002
House Bill 221/ aHVEC/aSFl#1 – Page
2
store and transport voting systems to and from polling places. It further states that the county
clerk be responsible for the keys, seals and programming of all voting systems in the custody of
the county.
Synopsis of SFl#1 Amendment
Senate Floor Amendment 1 to HVEC amendment to House Bill 221 enacts a new section to the
election code that would not allow the state to transfer ownership of the paper ballot voting
systems it purchased to the counties without permission from each of the board of county
commissioners. It also requires the state to provide maintenance on its state-owned paper ballot
voting systems. The counties shall store the voting systems pursuant to guidelines issued by the
Secretary of State.
Synopsis of HVEC Amendment
House Voters and Elections Committee Amendment 1, revises language in Subsection C, which
is at the end of the bill, to say that the State Board of Finance may dispose of electronic voting
systems acquired pursuant to the law. In the original bill, instead of pursuant to the law, it was
pursuant to “this subsection in any manner that is consistent with the interests of the state."
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 221 amends Section 1-9-17 to permit the State Board of Finance and counties to
renegotiate their lease-purchase contracts on electronic voting machines and thus impact the
disposition of the machines. The bill states: “Upon the transfer of ownership in the electronic
voting systems to the state board of finance, the contract shall be terminated and no additional
payments from the county shall be due."
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Documents submitted by the Secretary of State indicate that there are three pieces of paper ballot
voting equipment that need to be covered by maintenance agreements; the M100, which reads
the paper ballots; the Automark, which make voting ADA compliant; and the M650, which
counts the ballots. The attached spreadsheet lists by county the maintenance cost for the paper
ballot voting systems. The Secretary of State estimates that the hardware and software warranty
agreement on the voting systems would be $1.3 million annually. The Secretary of State also
suggests including an emergency clause in the bill, which would allow it to cover maintenance
costs that may be need for the June primary. If the bill does not pass, counties may look to BOF
for a loan.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
As a point of clarification, this bill and its Senate Floor amendment address two sets of voting
systems. First, are touch screen machines currently owned by the State Board of Finance and
purchased through the Electronic Voting System Revolving Fund, which are referenced in the
originally introduced bill. Second, are the paper ballot systems currently owned by the Secretary
of State and referenced in the Senate Floor amendment.
pg_0003
House Bill 221/ aHVEC/aSFl#1 – Page
3
The Attorney General’s Office questions if under the amendment, the State Board of Finance
will have to pay maintenance fees. Is this consistent with Section 1-9-17(B) (4). What if in the
future a county enters into a lease purchase agreement with the Board of Finance for additional
paper ballot machines. Who is responsible then.
Prior to 2006, many counties entered into lease-purchase agreements with the State Board of
Finance on touch screen voting machines. Under Section 1-9-17(B), the counties agree to own
the machines upon completion of several lease payments to the Board of Finance. However, the
2006 Legislature effectively banned the use of touch screen voting machines in New Mexico.
This meant several counties still owed payment on these machines, but could no longer use them
in elections and did not have ownership rights to sell them.
It is unclear whether House Bill 221 is meant to address this situation. The bill refers to “transfer
of ownership" to the State Board of Finance but the counties have been paying “lease" payments
in order to purchase these machines and get full ownership of the machines. Why would
ownership be transferred to the State Board of Finance now. If so, does “transfer of ownership"
mean that “no additional payments from the county" shall be due.
The Senate Floor Amendment also addresses ownership and maintenance of the paper ballot
voting systems. It would allow counties to refuse to take ownership (and thus not pay the
maintenance fees) for voting machines. The counties have traditionally had to purchase voting
machines (via lease purchase agreements from the State Board of Finance) and pay the fees
under Section 1-9-17.
However, in 2006, the legislature authorized the Secretary of State’s office to purchase paper-
ballot machines. Whether the legislature’s appropriation for this project also included on-going
maintenance fees for the machines is unclear. It does appear, however, that the current Secretary
of State and the county clerks do not have budgets for on-going maintenance fees.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
The bill refers to “transfer of ownership" to the State Board of Finance but the counties have
been paying “lease" payments in order to purchase these machines and get full ownership of the
machines. Why would ownership be transferred to the State Board of Finance now. If so, does
“transfer of ownership" mean that “no additional payments from the county" shall be due.
EO/mt:bb
pg_0004 pg_0005