Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Steinborn
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1-24-2008
HB 313
SHORT TITLE Las Cruces Veterans Museum
SB
ANALYST Dearing
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
$250.0 Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY08
FY09
FY10 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
*$.01
*$.01 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 313 appropriates $250 thousand from the general fund to Cultural Affairs department
for the purpose of developing a veteran’s museum in Las Cruces.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $250 thousand contained in House Bill 313 is a recurring expense to the
general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY09 shall
revert to the general fund.
The establishment of an additional museum within the Cultural Affairs department system will
increase annual operating costs independent of any capital costs associated with construction.
This fiscal impact report does not estimate construction and other capital (land) costs. The
additional operating costs are estimated using the average costs of other museums in this system
pg_0002
House Bill 313 – Page
2
as proxy for recurring operating costs for a new museum.
*Additional annual oper4ating costs for the proposed veterans’ museum in House Bill 313 are
unknown. Other museums within the Cultural Affairs department system have a range of annual
operating costs from a low of $1.7 million to a high of $2.8 million with an average of $2.2
million.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
While recognizing the economic value of museums at the local level, LFC staff remains
concerned over the department’s ability to address deferred maintenance and the funds needed to
restore or enhance extremely valuable existing collections and exhibits. National data shows
significant returns to the state’s appropriations with increased attendance when facilities and
exhibits are properly maintained and rotated.
The LFC remains concerned with the department’s ability to cover additional operating
expenses, both when new state-owned facilities are brought on line as well as operating
commitments to private and local government facilities. In many instances, acceptances of
additional facilities incur additional operating costs to the department, placing strain on the
facilities maintenance budget the department receives to address the buildings’ conditions.
Because the DCA properties are not under the jurisdiction of the Property Control Division of
the General Services Department, the DCA is responsible for maintenance and renovation of its
own facilities and exhibits, including restoration of art collections.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
Upon legislative enactment and completion of this museum, the LFC recommends that the
Cultural Affairs department submit a plan for program evaluation with specific program goals
and criteria for assessing the effectiveness and provide suggested outputs, outcomes and
performance measures to evaluate the performance of state government programs as prescribed
in the Accountability in Government Act.
PD/mt