Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lopez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/31/08
HB
SHORT TITLE Conservancy District and General Elections
SB 396
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Association of County Clerks (ACC)
Secretary of State (SOS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 396 amends several sections of the “Conservancy District Act", NMSA Sections 73-
14-1 to 73-14-31.1 to generally require that the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District hold
elections for its Board of Directors at the same time as the general election, or the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November of each even numbered year. The bill would require that the
same polling places be used for both elections. Current law requires that elections for MRGCD
board members be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of June in each odd-numbered
year. See NMSA Section 73-14-24B (1978).
It amends provisions applicable to that conservancy district to remove authorization currently
granted the board to hire a person to provide election services under contract approved by the
Secretary of State, and designates the county clerk as the district’s “election director".
The bill changes the time for issuing the election proclamation for that district from the first
Monday in January, to the first Monday in June. It also would require that elections for board
members of that district be conducted in accordance with the Election Code (Article 1 Chapter 1
NMSA) along with applicable provisions of the Conservancy District Act.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 396 – Page
2
Finally, it enacts temporary provisions designating election and term expiration dates for current
board members, based upon the year of their prior election and repeals NMSA Section 73-14-
31.1 which currently regulates absentee ballot applications, but retains and modifies other
provisions governing that subject.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The Attorney General’s Office states that the sections of law amended by this bill relate to
conservancy districts established prior to 1930, embracing land in four or more counties, and
encompassing more than one hundred thousand acres. Presumably this only includes the Middle
Rio Grande Conservancy District (MRGCD). See NMSA Section 73-14-18, NMAC 21.7.2
referring to that section and providing for MRGCD elections. Other state law provisions
governing elections for the boards of other districts are not amended by this bill. See NMSA 73-
14-56 (1978). Inconsistent provisions in NMAC 21.7.2 governing election of board members for
the MRGCD will have to be amended to conform to this bill.
The Association of County Clerks raise concerns that combining a non-partisan election with the
General Election will make an already long and complicated ballot more so and will create more
ballots styles in larger counties, leading to confusion. Currently, districts do not align with
General Election Precincts.
The Secretary of State echo similar concern to ACC and highlights Bernalillo County where it
explains that the General Election Ballot is already long, especially in years when Judges stand
for retention. Adding additional races on the general election ballot will force the county to use a
two-page ballot. The approximate additional cost of a two-page ballot in Bernalillo County is at
least $1 million.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
The Attorney General’s Office points out that the rule governing MRGCD elections appears to
conflict with current law (NMSA 73-14-24B 1978) in that the rule provides for board member
elections on the first Tuesday in November of each even-numbered year. See NMAC 21.7.2.16.
This bill will apparently conform state law to that rule.
ALTERNATIVES
The Association of County Clerks suggests that all non-partisan elections be held together in odd
numbered years because greater voter turnout is possible and less costs are associated with the
elections.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The law will continue to require that elections for the board of directors of the MRGCD be
conducted in June of each odd-numbered year.
EO/nt