Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Sanchez, M
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/28/08
2/1/08 HB
SHORT TITLE
Local Government Traffic Fine Limits
SB 442/aSJC/aSFl#1
ANALYST C. Sanchez
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
FY10
Indeterminable
Facilities Fund
&
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)\
Department of Corrections (DOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFl#1 Amendment
The Senate Floor amendment makes technical changes to the original bill.
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
The Senate Judiciary Committee amendment to SB 442 simply clarifies that the applicability of
the limits/criteria on the new fines and costs or fees contained in the original bill would apply
only to a municipality with a population of greater than 200,000 as of the last census.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 442 proposes to amend the nuisance abatement provisions set forth in Section 3-18-
17 NMSA 1978 by providing that, with respect to any municipality (including a home rule
municipality that has adopted a charter pursuant to Article 10, Section 6 of the New Mexico
Constitution), penalties or fines and costs or fees imposed by an ordinance for failure to obey a
traffic sign or signal (including a red light violation) or for a speeding offense or violation shall
be limited as follows:
pg_0002
Senate Bill 442/aSJC/aSFl#1 – Page
2
the total amount of the assessed fines, fees and costs shall not exceed $75.00;
the total amount of the assessed fines, fees and costs shall be distributed to the AOC, of
which:
o
10% shall be credited to DWI drug court programs; and
o
90% shall be transferred to the New Mexico finance authority for deposit into the
metropolitan court bond guarantee fund; and
Beginning with fiscal year 2009, the municipality shall cause an audit of the program to
be conducted by the state auditor or an independent auditor.
SB 442 also proposes to enact a new section of the New Mexico Finance Authority Act that will
create the “metropolitan court bond guarantee fund," the money in which is appropriated to the
authority as a credit enhancement to the distributions to the court facilities fund. The fund will
serve to guarantee and secure the payment of principal, interest, premiums and expenses on
bonds issued pursuant to Section 34-9-16 NMSA 1978. Upon payment in full of all such
principal, interest, premiums and expenses, the authority shall certify that all obligations for the
bonds have been paid in full and the AOC shall cease the transfer of the monies to the fund and,
instead, transfer any further funds to the TSB.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill will have minimal fiscal impact on the Metropolitan Court. If enacted, the Court will
likely receive additional funding for its DWI/drug court. The amount and impact of such
additional funding is indeterminable at this time.
While the bill proposes to amend the New Mexico Finance Authority Act to provide for a credit
enhancement for the Metropolitan Court’s outstanding bonds, this provision will not have any
direct fiscal implications on the Court.
Revenue that results from this statute could eventually reduce or even replace general fund
monies that are used for DWI Drug Courts and the Facilities Fund.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
Additional funding to the Metropolitan Court’s DWI/drug court may enable the Metropolitan
Court to expand and enhance the services currently offered under the DWI/drug court program.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The bill should replace references to the “metropolitan court bond guarantee fund" with “court
facilities fund".
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Status Quo.
CS/mt:bb