Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Carraro
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/6/08
HB
SHORT TITLE Military Pension Income Tax Exemption
SB 504
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
FY10
($30,100.0) Recurring General Fund
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Veterans’ Services (DVS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 504 exempts from the personal income tax the pensions of those taxpayers who either
have been honorably discharged from the armed forces of the United States and who served at
least 90 days on active duty or the spouse of such a member of the armed forces.
The exemption would apply for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2009.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The annual impact for exempting the retirement income of retired members of the armed forces
is expected to reduce personal income tax revenues by $19.7 million. Since the bill begins for
tax year 2009, the fiscal year impacts shown above assume that the full impact of tax year 2009
will occur in FY2010. The fiscal impact is based on 22,000 retired armed forces in New Mexico
with a total of $464 million in pension income. The assumed effective income tax rate is 4.3
percent based on TRD analysis.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 504 – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
DVS:
DVS does feel that this exemption would attract many more military retirees and these
retirees would benefit the local economies around the state. Most of these retirees are in
their 40’s and thus not only bring in the federal retirement dollars but would also bring
expertise to the local workforce. Many of these retirees start small businesses and create
jobs in the local area. These retirees also bring in their own insurance and financial
benefits to the area and thus reduce the strain on the local economic infrastructure. Many
states now offer some type of tax relief to military retirees and New Mexico has fallen
behind in attracting these very valuable assets.
The language in the bill refers to the spouse but not to a surviving spouse which may have been
the intent. A surviving spouse may be implicitly included because that would be one way for a
spouse to receive military pension income but the language could be more precise.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
TRD:
Individuals with incomes and other circumstances similar to individuals receiving the
proposed exemption are likely to view it as unfair, especially when they compete with the
retirees for jobs and when the retirees have relatively high incomes. According to
information on the “military.com" website, military retirement pay can be over $9,000
monthly for high-ranking officers retiring in 2004.
The measure may encourage military retirees to move to New Mexico. These individuals
may possess substantial work skills that could benefit New Mexico economic development
efforts. It is sometimes argued that such individuals place lower demands on public spending
(education, law enforcement, etc.) than other segments of the population.
NF/jp