Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Sanchez, B
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/05/08
HB
SHORT TITLE Create Interim Process & Law Committee
SM 53
ANALYST Escudero
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Education Department (PED)
Energy, Minerals & Natural Resources Dept. (EMNRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Memorial 53 requests the creation of the Interim Regulatory Process and Administrative
Law Committee to study concerns about the regulatory process, review the proposed model
administrative procedures act, identify specific areas of reform, make findings and endorse any
necessary legislation to improve administrative procedure on rulemaking and adjudication and
ensure that agencies carry out the mandates of the legislature, the lawmaking branch of
government.
The memorial establishes membership of the committee as ten voting members appointed by the
Legislative Council, five each from the House of Representatives and the Senate, with at least
two from the minority party in each chamber’s membership. The Legislative Council would
designate the co-chairs of the committee, with a co-chair from each chamber’s membership on
the committee.
The committee would be staffed by the Legislative Council Service and the Director of the
Administrative Law Division of the New Mexico Commission of Public Records. The memorial
would be transmitted to the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Director of the
Administrative Law Division of the New Mexico Commission of Public Records.
pg_0002
Senate Memorial 53 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
None to the PED.
None for EMNRD. There will necessarily be some expenditure of funds incident to the activity
of an interim legislative committee, which presumably will be met from funds appropriated for
the legislature.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
As stated by PED, although similar to Senate Bill 528 in calling for the creation of the interim
legislative regulatory process and administrative law committee, Senate Memorial 53 differs in
these respects:
SM 53 does not specifically provide a term for the committee. SB 528 provides as follows:
.
Committee shall function until December 15 prior to the first session of the fiftieth
legislature (December 15, 2010). In contrast, section 2-3-3 NMSA 1978 provides that
interim committees created by Legislative Council shall terminate on or before December
1 of the year in which they are created.
.
SM 53 does not provide for an appropriation. SB 528 provides a $90.0 appropriation
from the general fund to support the committee.
.
SM 53 specifically provides for co-chairs of the committee to be one member of the
House of Representatives and one member of the Senate, as appointed by the Legislative
Council. SB 528 only provides for the Legislative Council to appoint a chair and vice
chair and does not specify whether they must come from the House of Representatives or
the Senate.
Like Senate Bill 528, SM 53 is less sweeping than other legislative attempts to revamp state
regulatory processes such as HB 685 (Administrative Accountability Act) introduced in 2007’s
60-day session, which proposed detailed procedures for agencies to follow and numerous
requirements on agencies related to rulemaking, adjudications, fees and licenses. It is also less
far-reaching than House Joint Resolution 12, Senate Joint Resolution 5 and Senate Joint
Resolution 7, which propose a constitutional amendment allowing an interim or standing
committee to annul an agency rule if the committee finds that the agency or officer of the
executive branch was not “authorized" to adopt the rule. Senate Memorial 53 also does not
immediately set requirements for agencies as does HB 310 (requiring that agencies prepare a
regulatory impact statement if a proposed rule has an economic impact of more than $25.0) or
HB 614 (requiring agencies to conduct and review an economic impact study of a proposed rule
or amendment).
Senate Memorial 53 would at most result in a committee to study current state regulatory
processes and make recommendations for improvement which may be taken by future
legislation. Any review or study of current processes would necessarily be extensive because
state agency regulatory processes vary from one agency to another. Most agency enabling
statutes provide the cabinet secretaries with their own rulemaking authority and rulemaking
processes are promulgated by each agency.
pg_0003
Senate Memorial 53 – Page
3
A review of the model Administrative Procedures Act may provide recommendations for
changes in state regulatory procedures including uniformity of regulatory processes throughout
the various state agencies. As SM 53 suggests in its recitals, New Mexico’s current
Administrative Procedures Act only applies to agencies made subject to its coverage by law, or
by agency rule or regulation.
According to EMNRD, the subject of "regulatory reform" has been extensively discussed at this
session, and numerous bills have been introduced to study or make changes in the process by
which state agencies make rules. See "Conflicts, Duplication, etc." below. SM 53 is neutral in
that it neither calls for particular changes, nor identifies any particular concerns to be addressed,
other than inconsistencies in processes among agencies. The only specific mandate to the
committee is that it considers the Model Administrative Procedures Act being drafted by the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
PED may be asked to testify before the committee or to provide information and input regarding
its regulatory process and structure for the proposed report.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
As stated by PED, this memorial relates to/conflicts with Senate Bill 528 for the reasons stated
under Significant Issues.
This memorial relates to HJR 12, SJR 5 and SJR 7, which propose an amendment to the New
Mexico Constitution which, if approved, would allow the Legislature to, by law, prohibit
regulatory rules proposed by an agency or officer of the executive branch from taking effect until
the proposed rules were reviewed and approved by the appropriate interim or standing
committees of the Legislature.
It also relates to/conflicts with HB 310, which would amend the State Rules Act by adding a
requirement that agencies prepare a regulatory impact statement if a proposed rule has an
economic impact of more than $25.0.
It also relates to/conflicts with House Bill 614, which requires all agencies to, prior to the
adoption or amendment of any rule, conduct and review an economic impact study of costs,
benefits and impacts of the proposed rule or amendment.
Section 9-1-5(E), NMSA 1978 of the Executive Reorganization Act. (discussed above)
As stated by EMNRD, SM 53 addresses the same subject (the administrative rulemaking
process) as several bills that have been introduced at the present session. SM 53 is most similar
to SB 57, also sponsored by Sen. Sanchez, the difference being that SB 57 would have created a
task force including members of the legislature, appointees of the Governor and others to study
the administrative process, whereas SM 53 provides for a committee composed of members of
the legislature only. The other related bills, HB 310, HB 394 and HB 614 are fundamentally
different in that these bills would make specific changes in the administrative process.
PME/mt