NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Coll DATE TYPED: 02/09/00 HB 220
SHORT TITLE: Prepaid Telephone Cards SB
ANALYST: Valenzuela


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01
NFI NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Public Regulation Commission (PRC)

Office of the Attorney General (AG)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 220 limits prepaid telephone card providers from imposing "hidden" taxes, fees, or other charges, except for those items allowed by state or federal law, and disallows "rounding" of minutes used to the next nearest minute from cards sold within New Mexico. The bill stipulates that violations of these provisions would be sanctioned under criminal law (a misdemeanor) with each telephone card being a violation.



Significant Issues



The bill intends to solve the problem of additional charges being placed on phone usage through prepaid phone cards and from these providers rounding usage, often without the customer's knowledge. According to the Office of the Attorney General (AG) however, the bill does allow providers to seek approval for these fees by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or the Public Regulation Commission (PRC). When phone companies file tariff applications with the FCC or PRC, the companies, according to the AG, often list extra fees and charges, which, if approved, become the legally accepted fee structure.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



House Bill 220 does not contain an appropriation and would not have an administrative or fiscal impact on the PRC.



MV/sb