NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Mohorovic DATE TYPED: 02/04/00 HB 432
SHORT TITLE: Property Control Division as Lessee SB
ANALYST: Carrillo


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01

See Fiscal Impact Section

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



General Services Department

Office of Cultural Affairs



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 432 proposes to authorize the Property Control Division of the General Services Department to enter in to agreements with state entities that are exempt from the division's jurisdiction to help with the administration of capital projects. The bill also authorizes the Property Control Division to act as lessee on behalf of state agencies in agreements with private landowners. HB 432 provides clean-up language regarding Building Services Division responsibilities, other minor property ownership issues and potential conflicts with other statutes.



Significant Issues



The staff from the General Services Department comments current law requires the Property Control Division to "control" the process of leasing privately-owned space for state agency use, but does not include the option for the Property Control Division to act as the lessee on behalf of state agencies. Since the maximum term for a lease can now be 20 years, the state is a more stable tenant than a state agency, especially in smaller communities. There could be a reduction in time and dollar costs associated with the request for proposal process.



Regarding assisting with capital projects, the General Services Department staff notes agencies that are exempt from the Property Control Division's jurisdiction sometimes come to the division for assistance in administering major capital projects. Recent examples are projects at the State Fair and the Game and Fish Department. The Property Control Division cannot act as the official representative for those agencies in contractual agreements. This bill would allow the division to serve as owner representative during design and construction, using an agreement, when both parties agree its in the State's best interest.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



HB 432 does not include an appropriation. The General Services Department staff anticipates a reduction in lease costs because building owners would consider leasing to the division for up to 20 years to be more stable than leasing to individual agencies in a changing government environment. There would also be a significant potential savings in capital and operating money when building expertise is available to state agencies for major capital projects.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The General Services Department staff believes there could be significant time savings for agency staff, especially for those in local areas who now develop and implement a request for proposals process to lease privately-owned space.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The staff of the General Services Department provides the following comments:



WJC/gm