NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Knauer DATE TYPED: 03/15/01 HB HM 29
SHORT TITLE: Falsely Advertised "Tax Refund Loans" SB
ANALYST: Valdes


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
See Fiscal

Implications

Non-recurring General Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Attorney General



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Memorial 29 requests the Attorney General review the recent federal injunction in the JTH Tax versus H&R Block case barring misleading advertising by tax practitioners that inappropriately utilizes "tax refund" terminology. The memorial also requests the Attorney General take all appropriate action and make any legislative recommendations necessary for consumer protection from misleading advertising and exploitive practices by tax practitioners and loan companies to the interim Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Committee at their October 2001 meetings.



Significant Issues



The Attorney General is responsible for consumer protection and education issues related to the citizens of the state. It is their mission to prevent misleading advertising and fraudulent practices

intended to take unfair advantage of consumers. The intent of this memorial is within the scope of duties of the Attorney General's Office.



Legislation was introduced this year to prevent excessive interest charges for tax refund anticipation loans and excessive tax preparation fees. Senate Bill 322, the "Refund Anticipation Loan Act," would establish laws which place a maximum interest rate of 10 ½ percent on refund anticipation loans, requires uniform tax preparation fees and requires licensing of refund anticipation loan creditors through the Financial Institutions Division of the Regulation and Licensing Department.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The mandate of additional responsibilities without providing resources to perform the work would place a burden on existing consumer protection services of the office. While the office is responsible for consumer protection issues, to maintain the existing work levels while completing this additional task would cost $10.0 to $20.0 to research the issues, development recommendations and make presentations to the interim committees in the fall.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General's Office presently has a heavy workload with existing consumer protection issues. The office has a backlog of existing consumer complaints and currently processes over 5,000 complaints per month. The office has been aggressive in prosecuting false advertising and consumer fraud issues and has increased consumer settlement revenue. The additional responsibilities mandated by this memorial would be difficult to accomplish without additional resources to do the work.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



Senate Bill 322 would place regulations on the industry identified in this memorial.



MV/ar