NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
 
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
 
 
 
 
|   SPONSOR: | Wilson |   DATE
  TYPED:  | 2/18/03 |   HB | 754 | ||
|   SHORT
  TITLE: | Education
  Programs Tax Credit |   SB |   | ||||
|   |   ANALYST: | Smith | |||||
 
REVENUE
 
| Estimated Revenue | Subsequent Years Impact | Recurring or
  Non-Rec | Fund Affected | |
| FY03 | FY04 |   |   |   | 
|   | (1,000.0) | (2,000.0) | Recurring | General Fund | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
 
Duplicates
SB671
 
Responses
Received From
 
TRD
 
SUMMARY
 
     Synopsis of Bill
 
House Bill 754 provides a non-refundable
personal income tax credit of $100 for each resident who completes a six
hour/three session course of premarital education and counseling or “marriage
maintenance” presented by a licensed therapist or an official representative of
a religious institution. Written certification of completion, provided to the
persons engaging in these programs, must be attached to a personal income tax
return
 
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
 
TRD notes that about
250,000 married returns and 285,000 single and head of household returns are
filed annually showing at least $100 in liability. If the credit could be
limited to its intended recipients – people who would actually participate in
counseling except for the cost – it might cost the General Fund only $1 million
or so. The incentive provided for tax avoidance, however, suggests the more
realistically high “full year” figure.  
 
 
TRD
notes that the Department has no possible means of verifying the accuracy of
the certificate, since attendance at sessions is largely a confidential matter.
We would have no little but to accept the certificate at face value.
 
TECHNICAL
ISSUES
 
TRD
notes these technical issues:
 
 
 
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
 
 
SS/njw:sb