NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Madalena

 

DATE TYPED:

02/21/03

 

HB

523

 

SHORT TITLE:

State Fund Deposits by OCA

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Gonzales

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

 

 

NFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

 SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC Files

 

Responses Received From

Office of Cultural Affairs, State Monuments Division

Department of Finance and Administration

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 523 amends Section 6-10-3 NMSA 1978, which provides that all public money in the custody of any state official or agency be deposited within 24 hours of receipt, to allow the state monuments of the Museum Division of the Office of Cultural Affairs to be included as an exception to the 24 hour deposit rule and allow State Monuments to make deposits to the State Treasurer’s office no later than 10 days following collection.

 

     Significant Issues

 

Some state monuments have not been meeting the requirement to deposit receipts “…before the close of the next succeeding business day after the receipt of the money…”.  The discrepancy has not been noted in past financial audits.  Section 6-10-3 NMSA 1978 allows State Parks 10 days before deposits.

 

Given state monuments’ minimal staffing and mostly remote locations, the LFC performance audit of OCA of September 24, 2002, did recognize this problem and indicated that an exemption from the 24 hour rule for State Monuments is warranted.  However, the audit recommended that the legislation should grant “the state treasurer, in consultation with the state controller and the LFC, to grant exemptions of up to 10 days for agencies that demonstrate a hardship meeting the statutory requirement.”  This recommendation is different from House Bill 523 in that it would remove the exemptions from statute and establish a process through which exemptions could be granted.  Since no such bill has been introduced, House Bill 523 is an appropriate substitute that corrects the finding outlined in the audit.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

The exemption provided for in this legislation would have positive and more efficient implications for managing the operations of the monuments located in rural areas of the state.

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

The Department of Finance and Administration analysis of this bill did not note issues with this legislation.

 

JMG/njw