Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Gonzales

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

1/20/06

1/27/06 HB 200

SHORT TITLE Advanced Energy Product Tax Credit Act

SB

ANALYST Schardin

REVENUE (dollars in thousands)

Estimated Revenue

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY06

FY07

FY08

(175.0)

Increasing Recurring General Fund

(25.0)

Increasing Recurring Local Govern-

ments

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Relates to HB128 and SB254.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)

Energy Mineral and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)

Economic Development Department (EDD)

New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

House Bill 200 creates the Advanced Energy Product Manufacturers Tax Credit for businesses

that manufacture advanced energy products, which are defined as motor vehicles propelled in

whole or in part by electricity that have a hybrid motor, fuel cell systems, renewable energy sys-

tems, or any component of hybrid vehicles, fuel cell systems, renewable energy systems, or clean

coal technologies.

A credit of up to 5 percent of a taxpayer’s expenditures on advanced product manufacturing

equipment may be deducted from a taxpayer’s total liability from state gross receipts tax, com-

pensating tax, withholding tax, interstate telecommunications gross receipts tax, 911 emergency

surcharge, network and database surcharge, and telecommunications relay service surcharge.

House Bill 200 – Page

2

Any unused tax credit may be carried forward for three years.

To qualify for the credit, the manufacturer must employ at least one more full-time employee

than in the previous year for every $500 thousand of equipment expenditures up to $30 million,

and at least one more full-time employee than in the previous year for every $1 million of ex-

penditures over $30 million. Existing employees can count toward the employment requirements

if the taxpayer trained the existing employee, or the employee was hired to use the qualified

equipment.

Advanced energy product manufacturers may apply for the credit any time within the calendar

year following the calendar year in which they purchased qualified manufacturing equipment.

If a taxpayer who receives this credit ceases operations in New Mexico for 180 or more consecu-

tive days within two years after applying for the credit, the taxpayer rights to the credit and must

pay all taxes for which the credit was awarded.

The effective date of this bill is July 1, 2006.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

TRD assumes that investments eligible for the new tax credit will total $4 million each year.

With a gross receipts tax of 5 percent, this means credits will total $200 thousand per year. TRD

anticipates that tax liability for claimants of the credit will be large enough to absorb the entire

$200 thousand.

The credit will primarily impact the general fund, but several other funds will experience small

impacts. Claims against the gross receipts and compensating taxes will impact the general fund

and local governments. Overall, general fund revenue will be reduced by about $175 thousand

and local government revenue will be reduced by about $25 thousand.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

According to EMNRD and EDD, this bill will create jobs in and generate revenues from the ad-

vanced energy technology sector. The bill encourages the recruitment and retention of an ad-

vanced energy cluster economy. They note that in combination with New Mexico’s world-class

renewable energy resources and the technical expertise existing at New Mexico’s universities

and national laboratories, this incentive will make the state more attractive for the relocation of

advanced energy businesses. Further, jobs created by this bill will tend to be in economically de-

pressed rural and semi-rural parts of the state.

PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS

EMRND states that recruitment and retention of advanced energy businesses would significantly

assist the Energy Conservation and Management Division in achieving targets relating to renew-

able energy, energy efficiency and clean-burning alternative transportation fuels.

NMED states that recruitment of advanced energy manufacturers would help the Air Quality Bu-

reau achieve two performance measures related to improved visibility and air quality by decreas-

ing the likelihood that new dirtier power sources will be constructed. In addition, the bill pro-

motes two of Governor Richardson’s priority goals, increasing New Mexico’s use of clean en-

House Bill 200 – Page

3

ergy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

TRD reports that the bill would require 1/8 FTE to evaluate applications and maintain logs of

credits approved and claimed.

CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP

The bill is similar to House Bill 128 and Senate Bill 254, but these bills have tighter language

than House Bill 200.

TECHNICAL ISSUES

TRD believes that the employment requirements stated in Section 5 of the bill should be clarified

so that all of a taxpayer’s employees must be counted in determining the calculation, and so that

the replacement of one worker by another does not count as adding an employee.

TRD also believes the word “not” should be added to page 7, line 10 after the word employee so

that the tax credit is contingent on increases in employment.

Several language differences exist between House Bill 200 and similar bills House Bill 128 and

Senate Bill 254. While House Bill 200 allows the credit for manufacturers of equipment for

“clean coal technologies,” the other bills allow the credit for “integrated gasification combined

cycle coal facilities,” which is a specific type of clean coal technology. EMNRD recommends

amending House Bill 200 so that it becomes a duplicate of House Bill 128 and Senate Bill 254.

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

TRD notes that a presentation sponsored by Sandia National Laboratories on state and local tax

incentives and wage subsidies for manufacturers estimated that existing subsidies, such as the

technology jobs tax credit, renewable energy production tax credit, and industrial revenue bonds,

are enough to offset between 55 and 67 percent of initial capital investment. To prevent exces-

sive subsidies, TRD recommends limiting eligibility for the advanced energy manufacturer tax

credit to expenditures not eligible for other credits and incentives.

SS/nt:yr