Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Gonzales
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/31/06
2/2/06 HB 290/aHBIC
SHORT TITLE NMFA Public Project Revolving Fund Changes
SB
ANALYST Earp
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
NFI
See Fiscal Impact
Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates Senate Bill 360
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Higher Education Department
New Mexico Finance Authority
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HBIC Amendments
The House Business and Industry Committee amendments address two issues:
1.
A new section 2 is added to the bill which amends Section 6-21-4 NMSA 1978 to change
the title of the chief administrator of the New Mexico Finance Authority from “Executive
Director” to “Chief Executive Officer”.
2.
Section 6-21-6 is further amended to provide authority for NMFA to grant final approval
for “small loans” (defined as public projects not to exceed $1,000,000) without specific
authorization by law. NMFA indicates that this provision will streamline the current two-
step approval process which results in the NMFA providing interim financing for such
projects and then adjusting interest rates when the project is granted final approval fol-
lowing legislative authorization. Borrowers could benefit from lower financing costs in a
rising interest rate environment.
pg_0002
House Bill 290/aHBIC – Page
2
These amendments were proposed by NMFA but were not recommendations from the New
Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee. The amendments reduce direct legislative in-
volvement in the small loan approval process. While not specifically required in the bill, a rou-
tine reporting process on such loans to the NMFA Oversight Committee would assure that the
Legislature is fully informed about these smaller loans.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 290, sponsored by Representative Gonzales on behalf of the New Mexico Finance
Authority Oversight Committee, amends sections of the New Mexico Finance Authority Act to:
1.
Include nonprofit foundations and other support organizations affiliated with a public
university, college or other higher education institution as a qualified entity;
2.
Extend the sunset provisions providing legislative authorization for urgent economic de-
velopment projects from 2006 to 2009;
3.
Allow for money in the public project revolving fund to capitalize other programs spe-
cifically authorized by law. Examples of such programs include the Energy Efficiency
Bonding Act and State Building Bonding Act bonds.
The bill contains the emergency clause.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This bill provides institutions of higher education with an alternative source of debt financing
that does not impact institutional bonding capacity since the debt would be held by the support
organization (such as a non-profit foundation). NMFA reports that making use of the credit rat-
ing and size of the Public Projects Revolving Fund (PPRV) could result in potential savings on
the interest rate, the cost of insurance and the cost of issuance for these bonds.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
This bill is proposed by the New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
No significant administrative impact is anticipated.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 290 and Senate Bill 360 are duplicate measures.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
NMFA indicates that utilizing the public project revolving loan fund to capitalize other programs
allows the NMFA to fund these programs at lower interest rates than could potentially be
achieved on a stand-alone basis. By utilizing the credit rating and size of the PPRF there could
potentially be a savings on the interest rate, the cost of insurance and the cost of issuance for
these bonds. Two programs that could see immediate benefit are the Energy Efficiency Bonds
and the State Building Bonds.
pg_0003
House Bill 290/aHBIC – Page
3
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Have proposals from non-profit foundations affiliated with higher education institutions been
presented to or considered by the NMFA board.
What “urgent economic development projects” would be impacted by the proposed extension of
the sunset period for projects reference in Laws 2003, Chapter 325.
DKE/nt