Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lujan, B.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/6/06
HB 603
SHORT TITLE Clinical Laboratory Service Gross Receipts
SB
ANALYST Schardin
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
FY08
(520.0)
(540.8) Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Conflicts with Senate Bill 29 and HB325.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 603 expands the list of health practitioners who receive a gross receipts tax deduction
for receipts from managed care providers, commercial health insurers and Medicare part C to
include accredited clinical laboratories that are not located in a physician’s office or hospital.
Clinical laboratories were not included in 2004 legislation that made many other health provider
receipts deductible from gross receipts tax.
The effective date of the provisions in this bill is July 1, 2006.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This estimate is based on the Report 80, “Analysis of Gross Receipts by North American Indus-
try Classification System.” Total taxable gross receipts in FY07 for laboratories not located in a
physician’s office or a hospital is expected to be $32 million. Based on information from the fed-
eral Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) and from industry representatives,
pg_0002
House Bill 603 – Page
2
about 25 percent of these receipts come from managed care insurers. Therefore, the fiscal impact
to the general fund is estimated to be $520 thousand in FY07 ($32 million X 25 percent eligible
receipts X 6.5 percent statewide tax rate). This impact includes the direct impact of making these
clinical laboratory receipts deductible, as well as the impact of holding local governments harm-
less from the new deductions. Local governments will not be impacted by this bill unless practi-
tioners report their deductions incorrectly.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
According to DOH, recruitment and retention of health providers has been difficult in New Mex-
ico because of the gross receipts tax. Although much of this problem was addressed by the 2004
Legislature, some healthcare practitioners in New Mexico still pay gross receipts tax, while their
counterparts in most other states do not. Unlike many businesses that are subject to gross receipts
tax but pass the tax on to consumers, many health providers cannot pass the tax on because man-
aged care organizations and Medicare refuse to pay the tax.
In 2004, Governor Richardson signed an Executive Order directing specific activities to enhance
New Mexico’s behavioral health workforce (EO 2004-062). A concerted effort is now underway
to recruit and retain behavioral health professionals, particularly in the state’s rural areas. This
gross receipts tax deduction could function as a recruitment and retention incentive for clinical
laboratories.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Administrative impacts to TRD can be handled with existing resources.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 603 conflicts with House Bill 325 and Senate Bill 29, which amend the same section
of statute to include counselors, therapists and social workers in the list of health practitioners
eligible for the gross receipts tax deduction.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
TRD noted that receipts from the health industry have historically grown more quickly than gen-
eral revenue. Deducting services from high-growth sectors such as health care from the existing
tax base makes it harder for tax revenue growth to keep pace with inflation.
SS/mt