Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Campos
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/24/06
HB
SHORT TITLE Rules for non-human chiropractic patients
SB 202
ANALYST McSherry
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD)
NM Health Policy Commission (NMHPC)
NM Board of Veterinary Medicine (NMBOVM)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 202 proposes to authorize the Chiropractic Board to promulgate rules and regulations
for the treatment of “patients” rather than “humans,” broadening the scope of practice to non-
human patients.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no obvious fiscal implications associated with this bill. If more chiropractics worked
on non-humans under the supervision of veterinarians, it is possible that revenues from licen-
sures to either of the boards (Chiropractic or Board of Veterinary Medicine) could be affected.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The intent of the bill seems to be to allow Chiropractors to practice on animals in addition to
humans and for the Chiropractic Board to determine a framework in which this type of practice
would be appropriate.
According to the Board of Veterinary Medicine the proposed changes to the Chiropractic Prac-
tice Act to allow the Chiropractic board to promulgate rules and regulations for treatment of non-
pg_0002
Senate Bill 202 – Page
2
humans would conflict directly with the Veterinary Practice Act, which explicitly defines the
practice of veterinary medicine. NMBOVM further asserts that the practice of veterinary medi-
cine without a license is a misdemeanor for any person who does not comply with the provisions
of the Veterinary Practice Act and holding a license entitling the practice of veterinary medicine
in New Mexico.
The New Mexico Health Policy Commission cites that, according to the American Veterinarian
Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for Alternative and Complementary Medicine, veteri-
nary physical therapy that is performed by a non-veterinarian should be limited to the use of
stretching, massage therapy and stimulation. NMHPC further cites that he guidelines state that
only a licensed, certified or registered veterinary or animal health technician that is educated in
veterinary physical therapy of a licensed physical therapist educated in non-human anatomy or
physiology can perform veterinary physical therapy.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
NMBOVM reports that animal healthcare provided by licensed Doctors of Veterinary Medicine
is of utmost importance to the health and safety of animals and the public, and stresses that a
non-veterinarian practitioner runs a high risk of mis-diagnosis and treatment which could lead to
a major public health crisis. NMDOBM cites anthrax, plague, tularemia and rabies as examples
of diseases which manifest differently in animals than in humans, and that unless trained to de-
tect infections diseases that may be present initially as musculoskeletal disorders could have a
devastating effect on the health and safety of the public s well as the economy especially if the
crisis involves the “food animal” industry.
NMHPC points out that, according to the NM Board of Chiropractic Examiners, the chiropractic
practice is for the purpose of restoring and maintaining health for treatment of human disease
primarily by, but not limited to, adjusting and manipulation of the human structure.
ALTERNATIVES
The NMBOVM suggests that changing the word “human” to “patient” is of little consequence.
The Board notes that the Veterinary Practice Act has a provision allowing non-veterinarians to
work under the direct supervision of a veterinarian so that services such as chiropractic, physical
therapy, acupuncture, acupressure, dentistry, embryo transfer or other services may be per-
formed. In order for this to occur, the veterinarian must establish a verterinarian-client-patient
relationship and the treatment must be performed at the order of a licensed veterinarian who is on
the premises or nearby and who assumes liability for the treatment provided.
NMHPC suggests that the American Veterinary Chiropractic Association offers a certification to
Doctors of Veterinarian Medicine and doctors of Chiropractic which consists of 150 hours of
coursework and advanced classes.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The current provisions for non-veterinarian practice which exist in the Veterinary Practice Act
will provide for treatment under veterinary supervision and Chiropractors will not practice le-
gally on non-humans except under the supervision of a licensed doctor of veterinary medicine.
EM/nt