0001| HOUSE BILL 490 | 0002| 42ND LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, | 0003| 1996 | 0004| INTRODUCED BY | 0005| TERRY T. MARQUARDT | 0006| | 0007| | 0008| | 0009| | 0010| | 0011| AN ACT | 0012| RELATING TO WAGE CLAIMS; AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF THE LABOR | 0013| AND INDUSTRIAL DIVISION OF THE LABOR DEPARTMENT TO APPEAR | 0014| WITHOUT COUNSEL IN MAGISTRATE AND METROPOLITAN COURTS. | 0015| | 0016| BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO: | 0017| Section 1. Section 50-4-12 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1937, | 0018| Chapter 109, Section 13, as amended) is amended to read: | 0019| "50-4-12. WAGE CLAIM ACTIONS--COSTS--JURISDICTION--REPRESENTATION BY DISTRICT ATTORNEY--APPEALS.-- | 0020| [(a)] A. In all actions brought by the [labor | 0021| commissioner] director of the labor and industrial division of | 0022| the labor department as assignee under the provisions of [the | 0023| preceding section] Section 50-4-11 NMSA 1978, the [labor | 0024| commissioner] director shall be entitled to free process and | 0025| shall not be obligated or required to give any bond or other | 0001| security for costs. | 0002| [(b)] B. Any sheriff, constable or other officer | 0003| requested by the [labor commissioner] director to serve any | 0004| summons, writ, complaint or order shall do so without requiring | 0005| the [labor commissioner] director to [advance the] pay | 0006| any fees or furnish any security or bond [therefor]. | 0007| [(c)] C. Where [the claim or] all claims | 0008| [are less or when] joined together [are less] do not | 0009| exceed in the aggregate [than] the [sum of two hundred | 0010| dollars ($200)] jurisdictional limit of the magistrate or | 0011| metropolitan court, the [labor commissioner] director may | 0012| institute an action [therefor] against the employer in any | 0013| [justice of the peace] magistrate or metropolitan court | 0014| having jurisdiction without referring the [same] claim to | 0015| the district attorney. In the event that during the course of | 0016| the proceedings representation by an attorney at law [to | 0017| represent the labor commissioner] becomes necessary or, in his | 0018| judgment, advisable, [it shall be his duty to] the director | 0019| shall so notify the district attorney [of the pendency of said | 0020| cause and the date of the hearing thereof], and it shall then | 0021| be the duty of [said] the district attorney [to appear by | 0022| himself] or his assistant to appear for [in said justice of | 0023| the peace court and represent said labor commissioner in such] | 0024| the director in the cause. | 0025| D. In the event [such] the cause is appealed | 0001| by the [state labor commissioner or docketed in the district | 0002| court for judgment] director, no bond or other security | 0003| [for costs] shall be required or fees charged [to the | 0004| commissioner] the director for court costs or sheriff's fees | 0005| in serving process." | 0006|  | 0007| | 0008| State of New Mexico | 0009| House of Representatives | 0010| | 0011| FORTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE | 0012| SECOND SESSION, 1996 | 0013| | 0014| | 0015| February 8, 1996 | 0016| | 0017| | 0018| Mr. Speaker: | 0019| | 0020| Your LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE, to whom | 0021| has been referred | 0022| | 0023| HOUSE BILL 490 | 0024| | 0025| has had it under consideration and reports same with | 0001| recommendation that it DO PASS, and thence referred to the | 0002| JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. | 0003| | 0004| Respectfully submitted, | 0005| | 0006| | 0007| | 0008| | 0009| Vincent Gallegos, Chairman | 0010| | 0011| | 0012| Adopted Not Adopted | 0013| (Chief Clerk) (Chief Clerk) | 0014| | 0015| Date | 0016| | 0017| The roll call vote was 6 For 0 Against | 0018| Yes: 6 | 0019| Excused: None | 0020| Absent: None | 0021| | 0022| | 0023| | 0024| H0490LA1 State of New Mexico | 0025| House of Representatives | 0001| | 0002| FORTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE | 0003| SECOND SESSION, 1996 | 0004| | 0005| | 0006| February 12, 1996 | 0007| | 0008| | 0009| Mr. Speaker: | 0010| | 0011| Your JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, to whom has been referred | 0012| | 0013| HOUSE BILL 490 | 0014| | 0015| has had it under consideration and reports same with | 0016| recommendation that it DO PASS, amended as follows: | 0017| | 0018| | 0019| 1. On page 2, line 17, strike "his" and insert in lieu | 0020| thereof "the director's". | 0021| | 0022| 2. On page 2, line 21, strike "his" and insert in lieu | 0023| thereof "the district attorney's". | 0024| | 0025| Respectfully submitted, | 0001| | 0002| | 0003| | 0004| | 0005| Cisco McSorley, Chairman | 0006| | 0007| | 0008| Adopted Not Adopted | 0009| (Chief Clerk) (Chief Clerk) | 0010| | 0011| Date | 0012| | 0013| The roll call vote was 9 For 0 Against | 0014| Yes: 9 | 0015| Excused: King, Luna, Pederson, Sanchez, R.G. | 0016| Absent: None | 0017| | 0018| | 0019| .112162.1 | 0020| H0490JC1 | 0021| | 0022| FORTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE | 0023| SECOND SESSION, 1996 | 0024| | 0025| | 0001| February 14, 1996 | 0002| | 0003| Mr. President: | 0004| | 0005| Your FINANCE COMMITTEE, to whom has been referred | 0006| | 0007| HOUSE BILL 490, as amended | 0008| | 0009| has had it under consideration and reports same with | 0010| recommendation that it DO PASS. | 0011| | 0012| Respectfully submitted, | 0013| | 0014| | 0015| | 0016| __________________________________ | 0017| Ben D. Altamirano, Chairman | 0018| | 0019| | 0020| | 0021| Adopted_______________________ Not Adopted_______________________ | 0022| (Chief Clerk) (Chief Clerk) | 0023| | 0024| | 0025| | 0001| Date ________________________ | 0002| | 0003| | 0004| The roll call vote was 8 For 0 Against | 0005| Yes: 8 | 0006| No: 0 | 0007| Excused: Donisthorpe, Duran, Ingle, Kidd, Kysar | 0008| Absent: None | 0009| | 0010| | 0011| H0490FC1 | 0012| |