NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Whitaker DATE TYPED: 03/06/99 HB 10
SHORT TITLE: Amend Small Cities Assistance Act SB
ANALYST: Eaton

REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000
N/A $ 1,194.0 $ 1,194.0 Recurring Muni GF
N/A $ (1,194.0) $ (1,194.0) Recurring General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)





SOURCES OF INFORMATION





Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill:



The legislation would amend the Small Cities Assistance Act by categorizing cities into 2 two classes: less than 5000 persons; and 5001-10000 persons.



Cities less than 5,000 persons would be eligible to receive a minimum of $30,000 and a maximum of $50,000 from the assistance fund.



Cities with populations between 5,001 and 10,000 would be eligible to receive a minimum of $20,000 and a maximum of $35,000 from the assistance fund.



Presently, all cities with populations less than 10,000 persons are eligible to receive the same minimum and maximum of $15,000 and $30,000 respectively.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The Small Cities Assistance distribution from the Assistance Fund is financed from 10% of the Compensating Tax receipts. Amounts not distributed revert to the general fund. TRD estimates a recurring negative impact on the general fund in the amount of approximately $1.2 million (Reversions) and a recurring positive impact on the Municipal General Funds for the same amount.



Attached is a table provided by TRD, detailing the affected municipalities and the estimated effect of this proposed legislation.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



SB102, HB72



JBE/gm

Attachment