NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Picraux DATE TYPED: 02/23/99 HB 168/aHEC
SHORT TITLE: Amend Educational Retirement Act SB
ANALYST: Eaton

APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000
$ 0.0 ERA Retirement

(Parentheses ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

SOURCES OF INFORMATION



New Mexico Commission on Higher Education

Education Retirement Board (ERB)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of HEC amendment



This amendment strikes language that included New Mexico military institute, New Mexico school for the deaf and New Mexico school for the visually handicapped. The amendment also strikes language that would have allowed a school to be eligible that previously ineligible pursuant to Section 22-11-24 NMSA 1978.



Synopsis of Bill



This bill would permit independent two year institutions like TVI, Luna Vo-Tech, and others, to participate in the Alternative Retirement Plan (ARP) administered by the Educational Retirement Board (ERB). The ARP is a defined contribution plan as opposed to the Educational Retirement Act which is a defined benefit.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



HEC amendment: No changes to the fiscal implications described below.



No fiscal Impact. The Educational Retirement Board's (ERB) actuary reports that this proposed legislation will weaken the actuarial soundness of the ERA retirement fund. The ERB predicts that the membership in ERA will decrease and cause the stability and growth of the fund to be compromised. Over time, the ERB predicts a diminished ability to provide future benefits.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The Educational Retirement Board conveys that additional staff and funding in their FY2000 budget will be necessary to handle the increased workload that this proposed legislation will cause.



JBE/gm