NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Smith DATE TYPED: 02-04-99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Distribution of Motor Vehicle Excise Tax SB 260
ANALYST: Taylor


REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000
N.A. NFI NFI Recurring General Fund
N.A. NFI NFI Recurring Road Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to HB307, SB105



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Taxation and Revenue Department

State Highway and Transportation Department



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Bill 260 would gradually transfer motor vehicle excise tax revenue from the general fund to the road fund in the year after the highway department's annual debt service payments are below $30 million. In the first year after the $30 million threshold is met, 25 percent of motor vehicle excise revenues would be transferred; the next year 50 percent would be transferred, the third year, 75 percent would be transferred; and in the fourth year, all revenue from the tax would be sent to the road fund. However, if the road fund debt service were to increase above the $30 million threshold after the fourth year, motor vehicle excise tax revenues would be diverted back to the general fund. SHTD's use of the money would be restricted to the maintenance and improvement of current state highways.





FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



Reports from SHTD and TRD say that there would be no fiscal impact because SHTD debt service is above $30 million, and they do not believe that it will be below that figure in the foreseeable future.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



Neither TRD nor SHTD reported administrative impacts.



BT/njw