NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Cisneros DATE TYPED: 02/17/99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Natural Gas Feasibility Study SB 329
ANALYST: Gonzales


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000 FY99 FY2000
$ 400.0 Non-Recurring GF



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to HB170



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Public Regulation Commission

Local Government Division (LGD), Department of Finance and Administration



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Bill 329 provides a general fund appropriation of $400.0 to LGD for conducting a feasibility study of introducing natural gas into the unserved northern New Mexico communities from Cordova to Vadito.



Significant Issues



This bill contains an emergency clause.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The bill makes a general fund appropriation of $400.0 to LGD for the purpose stated above. The appropriation is for expenditure in FY99 and FY2000. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY2000 reverts to the general fund.





DUPLICATION



Senate Bill 329 is a near duplicate of House Bill 170; however, House Bill 170 appropriates $300.0 less in general fund for the same purpose and does not contain an emergency clause.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The Public Regulation Commission notes the following issue:



This bill provides no directive for the funded study to determine least cost alternative, best alternative recommendation, necessity for follow-up studies, etc. It merely provides for determining the feasibility of introducing natural gas to the referenced communities. If provision of natural gas service to these communities is the desired result, the bill should include directives for the study to consider available alternatives and produce a recommendation of the best alternative based on available information.



JMG/gm