NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Wilson DATE TYPED: 3-5-99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Cigarette Tax Distributions SB 623
ANALYST: Taylor

REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000
nfi nfi $ 1,300.0 Recurring Medical Trust Fund
nfi nfi $ (1,300.0) Recurring NMFA

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to SB-648

SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Bill 623 amends provisions governing the distribution of cigarette tax revenues. It requires that the distribution made to the New Mexico Finance Authority be redirected to the University of New Mexico school of medicine medical trust fund once the NMFA certifies that all bond obligations to pay for the cancer center are discharged.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The Taxation and Revenue Department estimates that the proposed changes in distribution would send $1.3 million to the University of New Mexico school of medicine medical trust fund. The New Mexico Finance authority would lose $1.3 million. TRD does not report a date for when the transfer would happen, but the NMFA reports that cancer center bonds will be paid off in FY 2006.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



TRD reported that the bill has no significant administrative implications.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES